Perspectives of Local Communities on the Impact of Chinese Aid: A Case Study of China's Aid Projects in the Education Sector in Guinea

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
Perspectives of Local Communities on the Impact of Chinese Aid: A Case Study of China's Aid Projects in the Education Sector in Guinea
Abstract
China's re-emergence as an aid donor has attracted the attention and criticism from Western donors, academia, and the media. In contrast to traditional donors, China's aid has been portrayed as anti-poverty aid, mainly due to its combination with other instruments, such as investment, and the absence of any political or economic conditions. This paper examines the impact of Chinese aid projects in Guinea's education sector from the perspective of the beneficiaries. The author collected data from both primary (interviews) and secondary (document analysis) sources. The present study concludes that China's aid projects in the education sector have received both positive and negative feedback, mainly because the recipients' needs have not been appropriately targeted. This study contributes to the literature on China's role in Africa. More specifically, it discusses the conditions for aid effectiveness in the field of education. Moreover, in the context of the globalization of aid practices, the study proposes best practices for China to adopt in order to improve the practices of its aid delivery. The novelty of this study lies in the methodology (qualitative method) used to understand China's aid from the perspective of the beneficiaries of its aid.
Publication
Journal of Globalization Studies
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
85-103
Date
2023-11-30
Journal Abbr
JGS
ISSN
20758103
Short Title
Perspectives of Local Communities on the Impact of Chinese Aid
Accessed
1/25/24, 4:01 AM
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Citation
Diakite, A. D. (2023). Perspectives of Local Communities on the Impact of Chinese Aid: A Case Study of China’s Aid Projects in the Education Sector in Guinea. Journal of Globalization Studies, 14(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2023.02.05