@phdthesis{chiang_unity_2022, address = {Macau}, title = {Unity of {Knowing} and {Acting} from {Christian} and {Confucian} {Ethical} {Practices}: {An} {Exegesis} of {Mark} 4:1-20}, shorttitle = {Unity of {Knowing} and {Acting} from {Christian} and {Confucian} {Ethical} {Practices}}, url = {https://library-opac.usj.edu.mo/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=201696&query_desc=an%3A83493}, language = {eng}, school = {University of Saint Joseph}, author = {Chiang, Sau Kuan}, collaborator = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton}, year = {2022}, keywords = {Thesis and Dissertations Master of Philosophy (MPH), University of Saint Joseph}, } @article{devito_evolutionary_2022, title = {The evolutionary argument against naturalism: a {Wittgensteinian} response}, issn = {1572-8684}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09832-3}, doi = {10.1007/s11153-022-09832-3}, abstract = {In this essay, we put forth a novel solution to Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, utilizing recent work done by Duncan Pritchard on radical skepticism. Key to the success of Plantinga’s argument is the doubting of the reliability of one’s cognitive faculties. We argue (viz. Pritchard and Wittgenstein) that the reliability of one’s cognitive faculties constitutes a hinge commitment, thus is exempt from rational evaluation. In turn, the naturalist who endorses hinge epistemology can deny the key premise in Plantinga’s argument and avoid the dilemma posed on belief in the conjunction of naturalism and evolution.}, journal = {International Journal for Philosophy of Religion}, author = {DeVito, Michael and McNabb, Tyler}, month = apr, year = {2022}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21]}, } @incollection{arcadi_religious_2021, address = {London}, title = {Religious {Epistemology} in {Analytic} {Theology}}, isbn = {978-0-567-68129-4 978-0-567-68133-1 978-0-567-68130-0 978-0-567-68131-7}, url = {http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/t-t-clark-handbook-of-analytic-theology}, urldate = {2021-09-06}, booktitle = {T\&{T} {Clark} {Handbook} of {Analytic} {Theology}}, publisher = {Bloomsbury}, author = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton and Baldwin, Erik}, editor = {Arcadi, James M. and Turner, James T.}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.5040/9780567681317}, note = {GSCC: 0000003 }, } @article{mcnabb_pestilent_2020, title = {Pestilent {Popes} or a {Pestilent} {Church}? {Judaism}, {Catholicism}, and {Skeptical} {Theism}}, volume = {61}, issn = {0018-1196, 1468-2265}, shorttitle = {Pestilent {Popes} or a {Pestilent} {Church}?}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.13571}, doi = {10.1111/heyj.13571}, language = {en}, number = {4}, urldate = {2021-02-22}, journal = {The Heythrop Journal}, author = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton}, month = jul, year = {2020}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21] GSCC: 0000000}, pages = {671--676}, } @article{mcnabb_papal_2021, title = {Papal {Bull}: {A} {Response} to {Contemporary} {Papal} {Scholarship}}, volume = {6}, url = {https://jbtsonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/JBTS-6.1-Part2-A4.pdf}, number = {1}, journal = {Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies}, author = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton}, year = {2021}, pages = {147--152}, } @article{mcnabb_ockham_2022, title = {Ockham on the {Side} of the {Angels}: {Why} a {Classical} {Theist} {Shouldn}'t be {Moved} by {Oppy}'s {Argument} from {Simplicity}}, issn = {0028-4289, 1741-2005}, shorttitle = {Ockham on the {Side} of the {Angels}}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nbfr.12766}, doi = {10.1111/nbfr.12766}, language = {en}, urldate = {2022-06-30}, journal = {New Blackfriars}, author = {McNabb, Tyler and DeVito, Michael}, month = jun, year = {2022}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21]}, pages = {nbfr.12766}, } @article{mcnabb_mary_2020, title = {Mary and {Fátima}: {A} {Modest} {C}-{Inductive} {Argument} for {Catholicism}}, volume = {18}, shorttitle = {Mary and {Fátima}}, url = {https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/perc-2020-0028}, doi = {10.2478/perc-2020-0028}, abstract = {AbstractC-Inductive arguments are arguments that increase the probability of a hypothesis. In this paper, we offer a C-Inductive argument for the Roman Catholic hypothesis. We specifically argue that one would expect the Miracle of Fátima on Roman Catholicism more so than on alternative hypotheses. Since our argument draws on confirmation theory, we first give a primer for how confirmation theory works. We then, provide the historical facts surrounding the Miracle of Fátima. We offer up two competing naturalistic explanations that attempt to explain the historical facts, but then, argue that a supernatural explanation is superior. Having established that something miraculous likely occurred at Fátima, we move to argue for the overall thesis of the paper. Finally, we engage several objections to our argument.}, language = {en}, number = {5}, urldate = {2023-04-11}, journal = {Perichoresis}, author = {Mcnabb, Tyler Dalton and Blado, Joseph E.}, month = dec, year = {2020}, pages = {55--65}, } @article{mcintosh_houston_2021, title = {Houston, {Do} {We} {Have} a {Problem}?: {Extraterrestrial} {Intelligent} {Life} and {Christian} {Belief}}, volume = {23}, shorttitle = {Houston, {Do} {We} {Have} a {Problem}?}, url = {https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=pc&id=pc_2021_0023_0001_0101_0124}, doi = {10.5840/pc202123110}, abstract = {Would the existence of extraterrestrial intelligent life (ETI) conflict in any way with Christian belief? We identify six areas of potential conflict. If there be no conflict in any of these areas—and we argue ultimately there is not—we are confident in declaring that there is no conflict, period. This conclusion underwrites the integrity of theological explorations into the existence of ETI, which has become a topic of increasing interest among theologians in recent years.}, language = {en}, number = {1}, urldate = {2023-04-11}, journal = {Philosophia Christi}, author = {McIntosh, C. A. and McNabb, Tyler Dalton}, month = aug, year = {2021}, pages = {101--124}, } @article{mcnabb_has_2020, title = {Has {Oppy} {Done} {Away} with the {Aristotelian} {Proof}?}, volume = {61}, issn = {0018-1196, 1468-2265}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.13604}, doi = {10.1111/heyj.13604}, language = {en}, number = {5}, urldate = {2021-02-22}, journal = {The Heythrop Journal}, author = {McNabb, Tyler and DeVito, Michael}, month = sep, year = {2020}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21] GSCC: 0000000}, pages = {723--731}, } @article{devito_divine_2021, title = {Divine foreknowledge and human free will: {Embracing} the paradox}, issn = {0020-7047, 1572-8684}, shorttitle = {Divine foreknowledge and human free will}, url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11153-021-09791-1}, doi = {10.1007/s11153-021-09791-1}, language = {en}, urldate = {2021-09-06}, journal = {International Journal for Philosophy of Religion}, author = {DeVito, Michael and McNabb, Tyler Dalton}, month = feb, year = {2021}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21] GSCC: 0000000}, } @article{mcnabb_cognitive_2022, title = {Cognitive {Science} of {Religion} and {Classical} {Theism}: {A} {Synthesis}}, volume = {13}, issn = {2077-1444}, shorttitle = {Cognitive {Science} of {Religion} and {Classical} {Theism}}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/1/24}, doi = {10.3390/rel13010024}, abstract = {Launonen and Mullins argue that if Classical Theism is true, human cognition is likely not theism-tracking, at least, given what we know from cognitive science of religion. In this essay, we develop a model for how classical theists can make sense of the findings from cognitive science, without abandoning their Classical Theist commitments. We also provide an argument for how our model aligns well with the Christian doctrine of general revelation.}, language = {en}, number = {1}, urldate = {2022-02-11}, journal = {Religions}, author = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton and DeVito, Michael}, year = {2022}, note = {0 citations (Crossref) [2022-09-21]}, pages = {24}, } @book{mcnabb_classical_2022, address = {New York}, edition = {1}, title = {Classical theism and {Buddhism}: connecting metaphysical and ethical systems}, isbn = {978-1-350-18913-3}, shorttitle = {Classical theism and {Buddhism}}, abstract = {"As an atheistic religious tradition, Buddhism conventionally stands in opposition to Christianity, and any bridge between them is considered to be riddled with contradictory beliefs on God the creator, salvific power and the afterlife. But what if a Buddhist could also be a Classical Theist? Showing how the various contradictions are not as fundamental as commonly thought, Tyler Dalton McNabb and Erik Baldwin challenge existing assumptions and argue that Classical Theism is, in fact, compatible with Buddhism. They draw parallels between the metaphysical doctrines of both traditions, synthesize their ethical and soteriological commitments and demonstrate that the Theist can interpret the Buddhist's religious experiences, specifically those of emptiness, as veridical, without denying any core doctrine of Classical Theism. By establishing that a synthesis of the two traditions is plausible, this book provides a bold, fresh perspective on the philosophy of religion and reinvigorates philosophical debates between Buddhism and Christianity"--}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Academic}, author = {McNabb, Tyler Dalton and Baldwin, Erik Daniel}, year = {2022}, keywords = {Buddhism, Comparative studies, Relations Theism, Theism}, } @article{mcnabb_basic_2021, title = {Basic {Beliefs}, the {Embryo} {Rescue} {Case}, and {Single}-{Issue} {Voting}: {A} {Response} to {Dustin} {Crummett}}, volume = {21}, shorttitle = {Basic {Beliefs}, the {Embryo} {Rescue} {Case}, and {Single}-{Issue} {Voting}}, url = {https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=ncbq&id=ncbq_2021_0021_0002_0203_0208}, abstract = {In this essay, we respond to Dustin Crummett’s argument that one cannot consistently appeal to body count reasoning to justify being a single-issue pro-life voter if one is also committed to the usual response to the embryo rescue case. Specifically, we argue that a modified version of BCR we call BCR* is consistent with the usual response. We then move to address concerns about the relevance of BCR* to Crummett’s original thesis.}, language = {en}, number = {2}, urldate = {2021-09-10}, journal = {The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly}, author = {McNabb, Tyler and DeVito, Michael}, month = sep, year = {2021}, note = {GSCC: 0000000}, pages = {203--208}, }